[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [bluetooth-dev] Stack library
I've been reading the mails regarding a stack library, and the suggestions for something similar to Ericssons API.
Just one question: Have you had a look at IBM's BlueDrekar? Maybe it would be wiser to emulate it's functionality?
(I haven't looked at it indepth myself though, so I might be completely wrong here, but it is probably more suited for a linux stack)
Software Engineer, Mobile Internet
AXIS Communications AB
office:+46 31 402138
cell. +46 733 800 665
> -----Original Message-----
> From: david LIBAULT [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
> Sent: Friday, February 16, 2001 4:49 PM
> To: Matthew Palmer; email@example.com
> Subject: Re: [bluetooth-dev] Stack library
> Le Jeudi 15 Février 2001 03:58, Matthew Palmer a écrit :
> > I've been doing some reading, and I think that producing a
> library is not
> > that big a hassle. The Ericsson PC reference stack
> contains an API for
> > programming with BT, and I don't see why we couldn't
> emulate something like
> > that. It has a Connection Manager interface, which is
> roughly analogous to
> > btd, and which will possibly connect to a daemon or kernel module.
> I already did it. I built everything in src into on library.
> Then I link the
> library with different applications (for different testing)
> all inspired from
> > The Ericsson API contains a lot of messages being passed
> back and forth -
> > my thought is to multi-thread the library and write it all
> in C++. It
> > would be possible to do it in C, but it would be untidy,
> and probably
> > wouldn't support a lot of the dynamic aspects of BT real
> well. With C++ we
> > can implement callbacks easily enough, and with lots of
> threads flying
> > around doing misc. tasks it won't be so bad.
> It don't think adding C++ stuff to the bluetooth stack will
> be on any help. I
> think the first thing to do is clean it up so that it becomes
> more robust and
> portable, and keep it in C for simplicity, efficiency, and
> portability (the
> low level of complexity of the stack doesn't require (on my
> humble opinion)
> to go to C++). We are far from a reliable bluetooth stack today.
> > Has anyone started a project of this kind, esp. based on
> the Ericsson API?
> > Does anyone have any comments, either "that's crap, here's
> why" or "yeah,
> > great idea" or even "have you considered...". I haven't
> been pondering
> > this for long, so no doubt I've got a thousand hurdles to
> jump yet. I'd
> > appreciate discussion on this to help the process along.
> Code will be
> > written RSN, as soon as I've digested the rest of the API currently
> > available (my comment so far - yikes that's a lot of crud).
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
> bluetooth-dev" in
> the body of a message to firstname.lastname@example.org
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe bluetooth-dev" in
the body of a message to email@example.com