RE: [bluetooth-dev] bug in inquiry result handler?

["Gathright, Dave" <dave@xxxxxxx.com>]

Read section 4.3 p532 of the v1.0b spec. I agree that the event description
is misleading. Or, just take my word for it, that the first one is correct!
:)

Dave.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gordon McNutt [mailto:gmcnutt@xxxxxxx.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 11:48 AM
> To: bluetooth-dev@xxxxxxx.com
> Subject: [bluetooth-dev] bug in inquiry result handler?
> 
> 
> In process_event(), about line 624 of hci.c (CVS version), I think the
> code expects the wrong packet format.
> 
> For multiple responses the code expects this layout (I'll use two
> responses as an example):
> 
> buf[0]     = Num_Responses
> buf[1-6]   = BD_ADDR[0]
> buf[7]     = Page_Scan_Repitition_Mode[0]
> buf[8]     = Page_Scan_Period_Mode[0]
> buf[9]     = Page_Scan_Mode[0]
> buf[10-12] = Class_Of_Device[0]
> buf[13]    = Clock_Offset[0]
> buf[14-19]    = BD_ADDR[1]
> buf[20]     = Page_Scan_Repitition_Mode[1]
> buf[21]     = Page_Scan_Period_Mode[1]
> buf[22]     = Page_Scan_Mode[1]
> buf[23-25] = Class_Of_Device[1]
> buf[26]    = Clock_Offset[0]
> 
> But the spec seems to suggest this layout:
> 
> buf[0]     = Num_Responses
> buf[1-6]   = BD_ADDR[0]
> buf[7-12] = BD_ADDR[1]
> buf[13]     = Page_Scan_Repitition_Mode[0]
> buf[14]     = Page_Scan_Repitition_Mode[1]
> buf[15]     = Page_Scan_Period_Mode[0]
> buf[16]     = Page_Scan_Period_Mode[1]
> buf[17]     = Page_Scan_Mode[0]
> buf[18]     = Page_Scan_Mode[1]
> buf[19-21] = Class_Of_Device[0]
> buf[22-24] = Class_Of_Device[1]
> buf[25]    = Clock_Offset[0]
> buf[26]    = Clock_Offset[1]
> 
> Does anyone know which is correct?
> 
> --gmcnutt
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe 
> bluetooth-dev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxx.com
> 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe bluetooth-dev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxx.com