Re: file-finder : was(Re: JFFS - ready for submission into 2.[34]?)

[Sébastien Côté <scote1@xxxxxxx.com>]

Sébastien Côté wrote:

> The results ?  Now Configure.help is inode #21, which is fine (it's now
> splitted in 18 parts).  I got 3 version of the node at offset 0
> (versions 1, 2 and 19) all with the same mtime and all accurate.
> Shouldn't the mtime from version 19 be higher ?  Since there were no
> power loss, shouldn't the accurate fields be set to 0?  I also got the
> node at offset 16365 twice, with the same version.  I think this is
> beacause this node was rewritten by the GC so this is ok but in that
> case, shouldn't the accurate field from the old version be equal to 0?

Forget what I said about the inode with offset 16365, I had
hallucinations.  But the rest is true!

-- 
Sébastien Côté