[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: glibc

On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 07:18:40PM +0200, Jonas Holmberg wrote:
> We have noticed that uC-libc sometimes makes it harder to port and write applications. Therefore we will replace uC-libc with glibc, complete with
> support for pthreads and dynamic linking. We plan to release by the end of June.
> As far as we can tell right now it looks like using glibc, as a shared library
> with the devboard_lx software, will take approximately 150kB more flash than
> using static uC-libc. If you think that this will be a problem, please let us
> know. Since Linux applications are written for glibc, and because it is a more
> complete library, we think that it should be well worth it.

I think that is a great idea.