[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: glibc



On 2001.05.23 20:02:42 Dragan Stancevic wrote:
> On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 07:18:40PM +0200, Jonas Holmberg wrote:
> > We have noticed that uC-libc sometimes makes it harder to port and
> write applications. Therefore we will replace uC-libc with glibc,
> complete with
> > support for pthreads and dynamic linking. We plan to release by the end
> of June.
> > 
> > As far as we can tell right now it looks like using glibc, as a shared
> library
> > with the devboard_lx software, will take approximately 150kB more flash
> than
> > using static uC-libc. If you think that this will be a problem, please
> let us
> > know. Since Linux applications are written for glibc, and because it is
> a more
> > complete library, we think that it should be well worth it.
> 
> I think that is a great idea.
> 
I think that too.