[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
> From: Bart Duchesne <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Date: 05 Feb 2002 15:45:01 +0100
> Tonight I'll test it on the devel board and check its performance. Then
> we have a interpreted language on the cris.
Well, there already was the interpreted fine language of Bourne
shell ready at your command prompt. :-)
> Why not make -mlinux a standard for gcc-cris ?
Because that's not the once expected function of the "gcc-cris"
command, and it's generally bad news to change functionality
under users' feet. That name was set a long time ago (long
before the "-mlinux" functionality) and many things have changed
The plan is (but not in the *next* release), to provide the name
"cris-axis-linux-gnu-gcc" as todays "gcc-cris -mlinux". That's
what's expected these days by a cross-compiler for a platform
named "cris-axis-linux-gnu", so should come as no surprise. :-)
Just-"gcc-cris" would be obsoleted for cris-axis-elf-gcc, and
likewise with the other tools.
- Re: LUA
- From: Bart Duchesne <email@example.com>