[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: e100boot for Windows available?



Nice! Would it be possible for you to share the code with the rest
of the world?

(e100boot has no license AFAIK and is not contaminated by GPL
which means that you can choose to keep the code proprietary)

/Mikael

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dev-etrax@xxxxxxx.com]On">mailto:owner-dev-etrax@xxxxxxx.com]On
Behalf Of David Kilp
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 11:31 PM
To: dev-etrax
Subject: RE: e100boot for Windows available?


Thanks for the information. After a few minor tweaks to my existing e100boot.c file, I was able to use this program and perform a successful network upgrade from a Win-2K laptop. 

You certainly saved me a bunch of time! Thanks!

--David Kilp 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mikael Starvik [mailto:starvik@xxxxxxx.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 1:19 AM
> To: David Kilp; dev-etrax
> Subject: RE: e100boot for Windows available?
> 
> 
> One of our customers have made a flashing utility for windows.
> http://www.elphel.com/downloads/index.html.
> 
> I have never tested it and I don' know how compatible it is
> with e100boot. Otherwise I agree that I should be rater simple to
>  port e100boot to windows with libpcap for windows or similar.
> Maybe it I can be tricky to get it to work on all different
> Windows versions.
> 
> /Mikael
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dev-etrax@xxxxxxx.com]On">mailto:owner-dev-etrax@xxxxxxx.com]On
> Behalf Of David Kilp
> Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:56 PM
> To: dev-etrax
> Subject: e100boot for Windows available?
> 
> 
> Just wondering if anyone has ported the flashing utility, 
> e100boot, to a Windows platform? There are times where it 
> would be useful to reflash a unit without having a Linux box 
> around (sad as that may seem....). 
> 
> Looking at the code, it seems like it's doable at least for 
> the server-side portion (sbl). The client side part would 
> still have to be built on the Linux side and the resulting 
> images copied over but seems possible. Just thought I'd see 
> if somebody has already done it and would like to share the results.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> David Kilp
>