[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: ptablespec (I lost 1Mb in the flash3 partition)
Yes, that is correct and flash2 must be at least 0x050000 for jffs to work
properly (less may work if you never modify jffs).
From: email@example.com">mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] On Behalf Of Frossard Philippe
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 9:53 AM
To: Jonas Holmberg; dev-etrax
Subject: Re: ptablespec (I lost 1Mb in the flash3 partition)
Ok, I understand now. I'm trying to modify the ptablespec file.
In the ptablespec file the sum of the size must be equal to 0x200000
(2Mx16). Is that correct ? (With the devboard_lx)
# name size rw-options type image-file
rescue 0x010000 ro rescue rescue.img
flash1 0x1a0000 ro kernel flash1.img
flash2 0x050000 rw jffs flash2.img
Jonas Holmberg a écrit:
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 04:42:25PM +0100, Philippe Frossard wrote:
>>I'm all right with you about your comment,
>>The initial df command on the devboard_lx was (I lost 1Mb in the flash3
> I'm not sure if you are aware of it, but flash3 is just a "helper
> partition". It's the cramfs-part of flash1 set up by axisflashmap to
> make the kernel able to mount the cramfs-partition as the root fs
> using a MTD block device.
> If you remove files from the root partition, flash3 will be smaller
> even though the size of flash1 remains the same.