[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Killing JFFS under 2.2
David Woodhouse wrote:
> firstname.lastname@example.org said:
> > This is even worse, no ? I can't see why the middle of a sector
> > would be empty. fmc->head->offset if probably set to 0x2cfec8 since it
> > sees no data in front of it when it scans (I would have to check how
> > this is set).
> The empty space is exactly 0x203c bytes - i.e. sizeof(jffs_node) + 4096.
> Is it possible that the space was allocated for a new node, then the node
> wasn't actually written to the flash before GC kicked in from another
> thread and wrote lots of data after the newly-allocated space?
I suppose it's possible but that would make the bug very hard to
If you fill up the empty space between 0x2cde8f and 0x2cfe8c (make it
dirty), is the partition mounted correctly ?