Re: Killing JFFS under 2.2

[David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxx.org>]

scote1@xxxxxxx.com said:
>  If it has already found some data in the scan (the head), each free
> space should be set as dirty.  Then the GC should be able to repair
> the damages.

do you mean....

Index: intrep.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvs/mtd/fs/jffs/intrep.c,v
retrieving revision 1.23
diff -u -w -r1.23 intrep.c
--- intrep.c	2000/07/26 15:02:10	1.23
+++ intrep.c	2000/07/26 15:16:59
@@ -626,6 +626,10 @@
 			     pos += 4);
 			D1(printk("jffs_scan_flash(): 0xff ended at "
 				  "pos 0x%lx.\n", (long)pos));
+			if (fmc->head) {
+				jffs_fmalloced(fmc, (__u32) start,
+					       (__u32) (pos - start), 0);
+			}
 			continue;
 
 		case JFFS_DIRTY_BITMASK:
?

--
dwmw2