[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: min_free_size again.
On Fri, 18 Aug 2000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> email@example.com said:
> > The question is - _why_ is it -8?
> I believe that this is because I was writing out 8 extra bytes that I wasn't
> accounting for - the name wasn't in the node that I was obsoleting, but it
> was in the node that I was writing.
Forgot to report this yesterday:
I got the maths wrong, and in certain circumstances the data_size of the
node to write went negative - and as it was unsigned, this meant that we
just ate all _all_ the remaining free space. Not good.
Now we only write out the name with the node if the node we're obsoleting
had a name in it.