[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Doc on JFFS



Thanks David !

Marius Hauki 



David Woodhouse wrote:
> 
> Here's one I prepared earlier. It should be mostly accurate. As ever, refer
> to the source for the truth.
> 
> dwmw2@xxxxxxx.org said:
> > Prod me on Monday if you haven't received a suitable response. I ought
> > to throw together some form of documentation anyway.
> 
> sjhill@xxxxxxx.com said:
> > Okay, I'm prodding.
> 
> Bugger. :)
> 
> OK....
> 
> JFFS is purely log-structured. The 'filesystem' is just a huge list of
> 'nodes' on the flash media. Each node (struct jffs_node) contains some
> information about the file (aka inode) which it is part of, may also
> contain a name for that file, and possibly also some data. In the cases
> where data are present, the jffs_node will contain a field saying at what
> location in the file those data should appear. In this way, newer data can
> overwrite older data.
> 
> Aside from the normal inode information, the jffs_node contains a field
> which says how much data to _delete_ from the file at the node's given
> offset. This is used for truncating files, etc.
> 
> Each node also has a 'version' number, which starts at 1 with the first node
> written in an file, and increases by one each time a new node is written
> for that file. The (physical) ordering of those nodes really doesn't matter at
> all, but just to keep the erases level, we start at the beginning and just
> keep writing till we hit the end.
> 
> To recreate the contents of a file, you scan the entire media (see
> jffs_scan_flash() which is called on mount) and put the individual nodes in
> order of increasing 'version'. Interpret the instructions in each as to
> where you should insert/delete data. The current filename is that attached
> to the most recent node which contained a name field.
> 
> (Note this is not trivial. For example, if you have a file with 1024 bytes
> of data, then you write 512 bytes to offset 256 in that file, you'll end up
> with two nodes for it - one with data_offset 0 and data_length 1024, and
> another with data_offset 256, data_length 512 and removed_size 512. Your
> first node actually appears in two places in the file - locations 0-256 and
> 768-1024. The current JFFS code uses struct jffs_node_ref to represent this
> and keeps a list of the partial nodes which make up each file. )
> 
> This is all fairly simple, until your big list of nodes hits the end of the
> media. At that point, we have to start again at the beginning. Of the
> nodes in the first erase block, some may have been obsoleted by later
> nodes. So before we actually reach the end of the flash and fill the
> filesystem completely, we copy all nodes from that first block which are
> still valid, and erase the original block. Hopefully, that makes us some
> more space. If not, we continue to the next block, etc. This is called
> garbage collection.
> 
> Note that we must ensure that we never get into a state where we run out of
> empty space between the 'head' where we're writing the new nodes, and the
> 'tail' where the oldest nodes are. That would mean that we can't actually
> continue with garbage collection at all, so the filesystem can be stuck
> even if there are obsolete nodes somewhere in it.
> 
> Although we currently just start at the beginning and continue to the end,
> we _should_ be treating the erase blocks individually, and just keeping a
> list of erase blocks in various states (free/filling/full/obsoleted/erasing/
> bad). In general, blocks will proceed through that list from free->erasing
> and then obviously back to free. (They go from full to obsoleted by
> rewriting any still-valid nodes into the 'filling' node).
> 
> --
> dwmw2