[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Does JFFS respect partitions?


First, let me say thank you for JFFS!

I am trying to get JFFS to run on one of 2 partitions on a DOC2000.
I ran fdisk on /dev/nftl/disc0/disc (in devfs-parlance; equivalant to
/dev/nftla I think; it's major 93 minor 0).  Using fdisk I was able to
create 2 partitions, /dev/nftl/disc/part[34], and successfully created
an ext2 partition in part3.  Now, I want to use JFFS on part4.  But,
it seems that JFFS only wants to talk to the raw block device
(/dev/mtdblock/0), not the partitioned block device.

I need to do this because I need one bootable readonly partition (ext2
works fine, I'll probably use cramfs eventually if the bootloader
supports it).  The 2nd partition needs to be writable, and therefore
wear-levelled, so I want to use JFFS.  But JFFS doesn't want to play
along :-).

The design of the system demands 2 partitions: one of which is
guaranteed to never be corrupted (the readonly partition), and a
writable but disposable partition, so unfortunately using JFFS for the
entire block device is not an option.  (in any case, I don't think you
can boot from a JFFS partition yet.)

Will there be any ill effects if I just remove the check in JFFS for

Also, what's jffs2?  Is it safe to use that, and how is it different?

Thanks in advance,
Jeremy Elson

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe jffs-dev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxx.com