[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: JFFS size problem
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Vipin Malik wrote:
> Why should you care about this? Because, the JFFS
> code needs to keep a minimum number of sectors free to continue to
> garbage collect. At this time, that minimum number is 2 sectors.
> (Actually I lied a bit in above, as I found out looking at the code, see
Er, yeah - sorry, this was actually correct when you wrote it but I
> + another 2 sectors because people keep getting GC stuck and
> we don't know why. This scares me - I want formal proof
> of correctness of whatever number we put here. dwmw2.
> fmc->min_free_size = fmc->sector_size << 2;
JFFS2 uses 5 blocks at the moment. Working out how low we can adjust
that is on the TODO list, but I wanted to be safe for now.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe jffs-dev" in
the body of a message to email@example.com