[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Bjorn Wesen wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Mar 2001, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > One other possibility I've been considering is putting the offending blocks
> > on the bad_list and having an interface for userspace to tell JFFS2 to
> > attempt to erase and reclaim blocks from the bad_list. And devices in the
> I vote for that instead of simply erasing all blocks without the
> signature unconditionally.
> If something breaks in the flash I would not want JFFS to reformat it
> automatically, because perhaps I can rescue some data even if some nodes
> don't pass the checksum (manually)
I second that.
Stephen Brasher Cirilium Corp.
firstname.lastname@example.org Tempe, AZ
Sr Development Engineer
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe jffs-dev" in
the body of a message to email@example.com