[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: JFFS2 node type headers.
I agree with Nico: I don't consider JFFS2 to have been deployed yet...
So go ahead and break things... Only the most adventurous have been
playing with JFFS2 so far...
We plan to base familiar .4 on jffs2 officially, and hh v.21 will be
the last of that line, so I don't think you have to worry about compatibility
on our sake until then...
Technology and Corporate Development
Compaq Computer Corporation
> Sender: email@example.com
> From: Nicolas Pitre <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 14:53:15 -0500 (EST)
> To: David Woodhouse <email@example.com>
> Cc: <firstname.lastname@example.org>,
> Subject: Re: JFFS2 node type headers.
> On Sat, 24 Mar 2001, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > So... do I just do it and break the existing JFFS2 filesystems, or do I
> > write all the compatibility code to deal with older filesystems?
> I would say: Break it ASAP while the pain that it will cause is still
> manageable since JFFS2 deployment is still limited.
> > JFFS3, anyone?
> IMHO this might look ridiculous at this point.
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe jffs-dev" in
> the body of a message to email@example.com
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe jffs-dev" in
the body of a message to firstname.lastname@example.org