[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: jffs for amd Am29LV160BB

On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, David Woodhouse wrote:

> The physical address 0x800000 appears to be an alias which maps to the
> first pair of chips again. Are you sure it's correct? Try a single mapping
> - the probe code can deal with finding aliases, as long as there are no
> empty regions:
>   { 0xe8000000, 0x00000000, 0x01000000, DOMAIN_IO, 1, 1, 0, 0 }, /* flash bank 0 */

This is not good.  Flash bank 1 is at 0x08000000 physical.  The best is
really to have two mappings virtually contigous.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe jffs-dev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxx.com