[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Major JFFS2 bug (?)

dwmw2@xxxxxxx.org said:
>  Vipin.Malik@xxxxxxx.com said:
> > Ok, I reduced the max allowed file size created by the program to 4000
> > bytes. The system ran till approx 55 power cycles before having a bad
> > CRC again. Again it was a file that was last been written to when
> > power failed. This time the size was 2710 bytes (Huh?). The CRC was
> > bad. So obviously, neither the older data (with its CRC) was
> > preserved, nor did the new data (and its CRC) take.

> Eep. Something's obsoleting the original data, on the basis that we
> have a  newer node for that range, before actually checking the CRC on
> the data in  the new node. Bad, naughty, and probably quite easy to
> fix. It's either in  the scan code or in read_inode.  

I'm not sure my diagnosis was correct. The scan code shouldn't allow the 
half-completed node to get into the lists, because it _does_ already check 
the CRC. 

Vipin, can you reproduce this and show me verbose messages and/or images of 
the offending filesystem?


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe jffs-dev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxx.com