[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Major JFFS2 bug (?)
David Woodhouse wrote:
> email@example.com said:
> > HeHe. I think we setteled this bug/feature thing long ago :)
> > I agreed that it's not a bug, but would be a _really_ nice feature to
> > have in JFFS2.
> Indeed, but I wasn't sure if I'd led you to believe that you could expect
> atomicity of sub-page writes; just not larger ones. Which you can't.
That's what I had understood from you (that write()'s with data
< PAGE_SIZE) should be
power fail safe. But your explanation makes sense.
> More to the point, I hadn't realised your bug report was about this and
> taken if off my TODO list :)
:( So this _feature_ request will go unanswered?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe jffs-dev" in
the body of a message to firstname.lastname@example.org