[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: JFFS is not broken (Was: JFFS broken?)

> I didn't want to add that complexity to the chip drivers if 
> it wasn't going 
> to be worth it. Were you flushing only the eraseblock that 
> was written to, 
> or flushing the whole of the range covering the chip on each write?

We weren't flushing at all (that's why I got into trouble in the first place).
I never noticed any problems with erase though (pure luck I guess).
An now we don't use cached addresses for flash access so everything is fine.
I was just thinking that other people may get into trouble in the future...


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe jffs-dev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxx.com