[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: JFFS2 & NAND




gleixner@xxxxxxx.de said:
> Maybe we  could reduce the information to a filesystem type and define
> the oob-layout  as constants in a .h file. That would be less overhead
> but gives the  flexibility for both chip and filesystem driver to use
> free oob layouts. It would be not a big hack to rearrange it that way.

I think that might be best. After all, there are only a limited number of 
such arrangements. 

I'd actually like to overhaul all the oob and ecc stuff in the mtd_info 
structure - I don't like any of it very much. If we can make do with the 
existing API for a while longer, then we can give some serious thought to 
its replacement. 

--
dwmw2



To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe jffs-dev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxx.com