[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: New jffs2 files stay uncompressed?
> firstname.lastname@example.org said:
> > Yes, is the above test the only reliable test to test for a
> > CLEANMARKER?
> It's not even _a_ reliable test. Let's guarantee that CLEANMARKER nodes are
> accounted as dirty space when there are other data in the block, so we can
> just check for used_size == 0 like we did before.
hmm, I dont see how to do that if no reliable test exists. Ahh, maybe in scan.c?
> > Another thing: Would it not be safe to skip CRC checks on the data in
> > inodes that don't have the ACCURATE bit set in scan.c?
> Er, we do, don't we?
Not in the stable branch. The ACCURATE check is done last and disregarded
if it's not set.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe jffs-dev" in
the body of a message to email@example.com