[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: New jffs2 files stay uncompressed?



> 
> joakim.tjernlund@xxxxxxx.se said:
> >  hmm, I dont see how to do that if no reliable test exists. Ahh, maybe
> > in scan.c?
> 
> Yes, and when we write the first non-CLEANMARKER node to a new block from 
> the free_list.
Yes, but how identify the FIRST non-CLEANMARKER write?
 
> >  Not in the stable branch. The ACCURATE check is done last and
> > disregarded if it's not set.
> 
> Hmmm. That's an oversight. We should be able to skip them. I'd rather not
> put optimisations like that in the stable branch though - I've been bitten
> by changes which are more obviously correct than that. I want to stabilise
> the trunk and feed it to Linus fairly shortly anyway - I don't expect it to
> be broken anyway, just that I'm being more adventurous there. It's 
> certainly stable enough for 2.5 :)

OK, but once you have fed it to Linus, can we add a few optimizations(to the stable branch)?
I want these but I don't want to use HEAD yet since it's in a flux.

   Jocke 



To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe jffs-dev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxx.com