[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Benchmarking JFFS2
> Is this too naive approach? This relies perhaps too much on the
> randomness of semi-random numbers and might mean only first few nodes
> are ever picked up and never nodes from the tail.
I think na´ve is fine. In fact, I can't even justify the suggestion that it
be exponential -- we could probably do just as well by picking the first
(i.e. dirtiest) block with 85% probability, and picking some other block
off the list with uniform distribution the other 15% of the time.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe jffs-dev" in
the body of a message to firstname.lastname@example.org