Re: Benchmarking JFFS2

[David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxx.org>]

On Thu, 17 Oct 2002, jlavi@xxxxxxx.fi said:
>  Of course measuring write throughput is just one side of performance
> but I think it is fair to say JFFS2 write performane on dirty file
> system with low performance CPUs has improved dramatically since last
> spring.

Fancy repeating the test with current CVS? I just committed the 
oft-discussed code required to avoid decompressing and recompressing nodes 
which haven't changed -- and to avoid even doing the iget() and building up 
the node lists for the inodes to which they belong in that case too.

--
dwmw2



To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe jffs-dev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxx.com