[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: JFFS vs. JFFS2



On Mon, 8 September 2003 19:09:15 +0200, Bernhard Roessmann wrote:
> 
> I have some questions reagarding JFFS2 and Axis Etrax100LX/MCM:
> 
> 1) What are the advantages/disadvantages of JFFS2 compared to JFFS?
> Am I right if I think, that, in general, it is better to use JFFS2 than
> JFFS (on Etrax100LX/MCM)?
> 
> 2) How I can use JFFS2 on Etrax100LX/MCM:
>  - enable JFFS in kernel config
>  - maybe editing some makefile/configfile to create
>    JFFS2 images instead of default JFFS images?
>  - what else to do?
> 
> Any help would be very appreciated.

Long answer:
You don't want jffs, unless you know exactly what you're doing.

Short answer:
Use jffs2. :)

Jörn

-- 
Schrödinger's cat is <BLINK>not</BLINK> dead.
-- Illiad

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe jffs-dev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxx.com