[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: JFFS vs. JFFS2
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bernhard Roessmann" <email@example.com>
To: "Axis jffs2" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: den 8 september 2003 19:09
Subject: JFFS vs. JFFS2
> I have some questions reagarding JFFS2 and Axis Etrax100LX/MCM:
> 1) What are the advantages/disadvantages of JFFS2 compared to JFFS?
> Am I right if I think, that, in general, it is better to use JFFS2 than
> JFFS (on Etrax100LX/MCM)?
That depends on how much flash you have - if you only have 2MB of flash
you probably have to stick with JFFS due to the minimum number of
5 eraseblocks in current JFFS2.
> 2) How I can use JFFS2 on Etrax100LX/MCM:
> - enable JFFS in kernel config
JFFS2 - that is.
> - maybe editing some makefile/configfile to create
> JFFS2 images instead of default JFFS images?
Edit the ptablespec file and change jffs to jffs2.
and do 'make files images'
> - what else to do?
I believe that's it.
> Any help would be very appreciated.
> Bernhard Roessmann
> Don't Fear The Penguins!
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe jffs-dev" in
the body of a message to email@example.com